On 11/27/11 10:24 AM, Larry Masinter wrote:
>> Depending on how the working group resolves some of the issues it is 
>> considering, the draft will need to be substantially re-written.  For 
>> example, if we 
>> decide to use an IANA registry (as seems likely) all of the text that Philip 
>> commented on will be removed from the document.
> 
> I think the body of the text might say "Use the values in the IANA registry", 
> but that the "IANA considerations" section would contain all of the 
> instructions for how to set up the registry.
> 
> That is, the document would stay the authoritative source for the _initial_  
> contents of the registry, but updates and additions could be managed through 
> whatever registration process we decided on, without having to update the 
> document or algorithm itself.

Makes sense to me (as an individual).

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


_______________________________________________
websec mailing list
websec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec

Reply via email to