On 2012-01-09 01:39, Julian Reschke wrote:
On 2012-01-09 01:25, Adam Barth wrote:
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann<derhoe...@gmx.net>
wrote:
* Tobias Gondrom wrote:
<hat="chair>
as it seems there is disagreement on how to resolve this, with only
very
few people having spoken out so far, I would like to invite comments
>from other working group members on this topic to see whether we might
have missed something.
It seems to me that all headers defined in RFC 2616 that allow para-
meteter lists of the `;name=value` form allow the value to be a quoted
string.
This header isn't defined in RFC 2616 and many headers defined outside
of RFC 2616 don't use quoted-string.
...
In name/value pairs? Example?
(As a matter of fact, not all header fields in 2616 are as consistent as
they should, but that's not an excuse for not trying to do better with
new header fields)
...
I note you didn't supply examples.
Best regards, Julian
_______________________________________________
websec mailing list
websec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec
