Hi Larry. I believe you said the W3C specs have already been changed to point to the WHAT-WG document. But I'll change the minutes to say "Nobody in the group objected to having this move to WHAT-WG, and the W3C documents can point to that document."
On Nov 15, 2012, at 3:02 AM, Larry Masinter wrote: > Re Mime sniffing, the minutes reported: > >> Nobody in the group objected >> to having this move to WHAT-WG, and according to Larry Manister, the >> W3C is also fine with referencing the WHAT-?WG document, so the work >> item will be removed from our charter. > > I did not say this. What I said in the meeting was that I had no objection to > the working group dropping the work in the IETF. > > To elaborate: > * I think dropping the work is the logical action if none of the implementors > are willing to do the work in the IETF. > > * I do not speak for W3C and what the W3C is "Fine with". > * However, I believe W3C management is concerned about insuring stable > normative references in W3C specs, but they will deal with those. > > Larry > _______________________________________________ websec mailing list websec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec
