Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Note that the new filtering will not allow publication of cases whose mail logs contain such garbage mail signatures as "This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information."
This seems a bit of a drawback, and worth a filter to bounce messages back to avoid a bunch of cases inadvertently becoming closed.
Is the filter triggering off "confidential" anywhere in the message (which would seem bad) or only in a signature or other intentional header?
Please make sure you remove any such nonsense from your .sig's before
+1. Hugh. _______________________________________________ website-discuss mailing list [email protected]
