On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Peter Tribble <[email protected]> wrote: > Martin, > > [Regarding the website move] >> >> How was it possible that nobody prevented this nightmare from happening? >> Why did Sun pay (!!!) somebody to implement this? >> >> Does such a measure increase transparency? >> Or is somebody trying to implement it more like a corporate website >> where transparency is not desired? > > The website transition hasn't been sprung out of thin air. It's been discussed > and planned for what seems like forever. The community has been given > lots of notice, and ample opportunity to get involved. The website team has > taken considerable feedback and worked hard to accommodate changes > requested by the community. They deserve our thanks for getting this done. > > There are going to be problems. Some of those are simply cleanup due to > old content (which was of variable type and quality) not migrating cleanly, > and the various groups on the site need to make sure their content is good. > (Opportunity for evaluation of opportunities for improvement as well, > I suspect.) > Some are simple bugs, and people need to report those. > > -- > -Peter Tribble > http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
Hi Peter, mmh. ok. But I preferred the visible hierarchy, rather than a db-based site. Plus: I think there are better issues to spend $$$ on. But as it seems, it is too late now. BTW: > Have a look at http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/fox/SPARC-Xorg/ Next dead link now ... (times out) rgds. - %martin _______________________________________________ website-discuss mailing list [email protected]
