Hi gang -
I just noticed why Gary thought this bug had not been updated
on b.o.o. for nearly 2 years: the time stamps are being stripped
from the Description as well as the email address. (thus you
cannot tell where one entry ends and the next begins).
see this CR for an example:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6661895
is this a known issue?
Valerie
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:20:00 -0800 (PST)
From: Valerie Bubb Fenwick <[email protected]>
To: Gary Mills <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [install-discuss] Where have the Solaris bugs gone?
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Gary Mills wrote:
On Sun, 6 Dec 2009, Gary Mills wrote:
I keep getting e-mail reports on two bug reports
that
I filed, but when I look them up, all I find are
very old
copies with no recent changes. These are:
6661895 /etc/sfw/openssl/certs has no well known CA
certificates
6823465 Option parsing typo in /etc/lib/lu/lusync
Is there some other place I should be looking?
As you don't say where you looked to begin with, it's
hard to say :-)
Everywhere I could find, I suppose.
I see the openssl bug here:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bu
g_id=6661895
That one hasn't been updated for almost two years.
Actually, the public field was last updated on 2008-11-21.
It seems that the stripping out of email addresses has
gotten overzealous and pulled out the time stamps as well.
I'll send mail on website-discuss & see if it's a known
issue.
so, all of teh public information is there, it's just
not clear where one entry stops and another begins.
and all of the public information is there. There are
a few other
updates that have happened, but those were to
internal only fields
(such as evaluation and interest list). There does
seem to be a
lot of "discussion" in that bug that should probably
be in the
Public Comments field (so it will be visible
externally). I'll
mail those that have updated the private fields and
see if they will
say more openly.
Yes, I'd like to see that part.
I've sent mail - hopefully they will move the information into
public comments.
Dave already noted that LU is not being supported as
part of OpenSolaris,
which would probably explain why that bug is not
visible on opensolaris.org.
Okay. It was a Nevada and Solaris 10 bug originally.
I realize that `beadm' is the replacement. It works nicely
for me on Opensolaris.
That's good to know :-)
Valerie
--
Valerie Fenwick, http://blogs.sun.com/bubbva/ @bubbva
Solaris Security Technologies, Developer, Sun Microsystems, Inc.
17 Network Circle, Menlo Park, CA, 94025.
_______________________________________________
install-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/install-discuss
_______________________________________________
website-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
