John Plocher wrote:
> Why doesn't giving Leader status automatically do the Participant
> termination stuff? In the future, as you rewhap the system and its
> labels to match the just-approved constitution, please fix it so that
> it does the right thing - having the admin manually maintain the
> required-but-undocumented relationships in your database seems
> errorprone and user-unfriendly.
The right thing would seem to be not requiring each user to have exactly
one status - both the old and new constitutions make Contributor status
a lifetime role, so having to take it away to grant Leader or Core
Contributor is inconsistent with that, and just introduces a manual point
of failure when you have to remember to manually restore the old status
if they stop being a Leader/Core Contributor.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [email protected]
Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System
_______________________________________________
website-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
