Drew Jensen wrote: > So - proposal - if no agreement is coming then a vote? > Either that or let the SC choose as I read the minutes.
I don't think the Document Foundation community is ready for a democratic vote. Probably every move and decision taken so far has been taken by the Steering Committee, and I can accept that this oligarchy stays in place until the moment when we have projects and some democratic procedures set up. When they say the "website list" should decide, they have probably in mind some kind of "website project" with minimal structure, that hasn't happened yet. Or they just thought it would have been easy to reach consensus. > At Oo.o I served as an observer for a few Community Council elections But then a vote was needed according to the procedures. Here I could just bring some dozen Drupal fanatics to the list and win the poll (Christian, I'm not saying you couldn't find an equal number of Silverstripe fanatics!). But this would simply not be the right thing for the Document Foundation site. > Andrea, Ben, Keith offer to build out the Drupal solution. My contribution would be more in planning than in actually building, as I specified. > What do you think? As bad as it can be, the Document Foundation is still an oligarchy. Let the SC choose. Then if people believe a simple majority vote is best we can go that way, but I'm not sure times are ready for this. Regards, Andrea. -- E-mail to website+h...@libreoffice.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/website/ All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
