Hi Andrea, On Oct 30, 2010, at 7:42 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Andreas Mantke wrote: >> If we want to use a CMS, we had to decide, if we want to use Plone, which >> some of the documentation-contributors already know, or another CMS (Drupal, >> Alfresco etc.) > > I never used the OOoAuthors structures intensively, but recently the Italian > OpenOffice.org documentation team expressed their desire to see the > infrastructure upgraded to Plone 4, for performance reasons. So they they > were thinking of a "vertical" Plone to Plone migration rather than a complete > migration, and I think the same would apply to documentation for LibreOffice.
Plone is a good CMS, and if it works well for the documentation team, then it makes sense to continue using it. However, I know the focus of the OOoAuthors project has been to produce PDFs and printed books, but there is a good reason to also work on thorough, online, HTML documentation for LibO in the future. (We do have the documentation wiki already: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/ ) If you're interested in online Drupal documentation, the best example I can recommend is the Drupal site's documentation itself: http://drupal.org/documentation Both in terms of workflow and final output, it meets the needs I think we have for LibO. From a user perspective, hosting it at an easy URL like "libreoffice.org/documentation" would be very important, and thus it should be integrated into our core CMS. -Ben Benjamin Horst bho...@mac.com 646-464-2314 (Eastern) www.solidoffice.com -- E-mail to website+h...@libreoffice.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/website/ All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
