Hi Sophie,
> > Of course, I am not suggesting that users should be forced to use a
> > tool that does not fit their needs.
>
> a small difference here, it's not users but contributors, just a small
> difference
I used the word "user" to mean readers and contributors. :)
> > Why don't we try out a small pilot project and get the early user
> > feedback, and see what happens? :)
>
> again, it's not users but contributors, still different but why not, let
> see who will duplicate the efforts and resources.
Michael, it boils down to your explaining how this will work.
* How easy it is to migrate old data. (A small demo will help)
* "Old vs new" demo videos to convince how the new tool is better (I can help
here).
> > A major factor in favor of trying new technologies is, we don't have
> > old legacy data; so there are no worries about losing data because of
> > non-compatibility.
>
> we have a lot of legacy data, so this is very important to take them in
> consideration. This is an important knowledge base.
Well, I hope Michael is aware of this data and its old format.
If the idea is to make is available through Drupal, then this would be an early
goal for Drupal team.
> > Note that LibO itself has a major paradigm shift vis-a-vis OOo: 1. It
> > will have a new design paradigm (feature vs content) 2. it will have
> > new interfaces
>
> I don't understand what you're saying here, what is this new design and
> new interfaces? Could you give some link to that?
> >
> > So why is it that we want a paradigm shift in LibO design; but not
> > for the help community?
>
> still I don't understand
OK from the blogs etc, this is what I understood:
LibO team exited from Oracle to follow their vision of how OOo should have been
developed.
One of the goals was Content-based development (against feature-based
development).
The Go-OO talked about prohibitive politics at Sun (not Oracle, mind).
They specifically mentioned that some features/bugfixes were deliberately
avoided at Sun.
It seems all their patches are included in LibO now (features+bugfixes).
Further, Go-OO announced closing Go-OO to continue with LibO.
To me, all this means that the LibO team will do something different from what
Sun/Oracle were doing.
It is not just a power struggle or clash of egos. (correct me if I am wrong).
So, we ARE talking about breaking away from the old philosophy that was
prevalent for 10-20 years.
If so, why not consider new ways of working also?
> > **** A case in point is this thread itself.
> >
> > It started when I wanted to know if Drupal is going to be adopted. I
> > never got my answer.
>
> I give one and ask some questions, may be you don't read it or do not
> want to answer. And seems I'm still an SC member ;-)
DUH!! one of the MANY problems in mail lists is that we never know if we are
talking to royalty. :)
In a forum, your designation would have told me you are SC member.
I will have to go back and search for your answer. :(
> > But we have since then covered a lot of other inter-related ideas.
> >
> > Now a mail chain is the least efficient tool for such conceptual
> > discussion. * We cannot reach any conclusion. * A latecomer cannot
> > read it and understand what is happening.
>
> Sorry, I can't easily access web content, that is why I'm stuck with
> mailing lists. See, this is the second power outage until I begin this
> mail, funny isn't it :)
I don't see how power outage will make a difference.
What's the difference between a mail list and a forum page?
Both are delivered one page at a time!
Both pages are supposed to be light (so as to not take time in loading).
> > A concept map (or an argument map) are the best tool for conceptual
> > discussion. Both can be collaboratively plotted in Drupal.
>
> I'm use to conceptual map on papers, sorry not easy to put on Drupal I
> fear ;-), but yes I work quite often with them, useful tool, that's true.
Michael, here is your chance to prove that Drupal can provide easy concept
charts! ;)
> So using mailing list is not an old habit, I would love to use other
> funny things like forum and online tools, it's just the only way to
> communicate and participate I have :-) sorry to bother you with poor but
> expensive connexion consideration, it seems however we are the major
> part of the world in this situation.
Again, I don't think forum are any different from a mail list in poor
connectivity situation.
BTW, I am glad that a highly active SC member is concerned about poor
connectivity.
This indeed is a huge problem around the world.
But you are focusing on loading of HTML pages.
A far more serious problem we face is in downloading LibO itself.
Why does LibO continue to offer only full downloads; and not updates?
That will help people with poor connectivity tremendously!
Oracle Open Office offers update.
Their marketing brochure actually boasts of large savings based on this single
difference.
So why does LibO not talk about "online updates" as a development goal at all??
Also, since Oracle OO also is open source, adopting that part of design/code
would be possible, right?
Regards,
-Narayan
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+h...@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/website/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
