I think though that we should know the license they are planning to
release it under even if a first release is way off.
On 08/08/2011 13:44, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Andreas Mantke wrote:
The reviewer should look about the license and that the project intent
to be usefull for LibO (not spam, joke etc.). If we look later at the
files, we had to test, if they work with specific versions of LibO. But
that is not the task for the reviewer, when he decides if he publishe
the project or not.
Actually, if I got it right when uploading this extension (everything
worked nicely, great!)
http://extensions-test.libreoffice.org/extension-center/italian-dictionary-thesaurus-hyphenation-patterns
the reviewer won't have license information available, since this
information is not asked for when creating the project but when
creating a specific release, which is only possible after the project
has been approved.
So a reviewer must probably decide based on common sense rather than
on the license, and then he must monitor the first releases.
Regards,
Andrea.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
