Brian Overstreet napsal(a):
> On Thursday 22 October 2009 07:04:54 Petr Sumbera wrote:
>> Brian Overstreet wrote:
>>> On Friday October 9 2009 06:25:40 Petr Sumbera wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> can somebody please review following changes to Solaris Nevada Tomcat?
>>>>
>>>> 6864292 [nvb119] some JSP and SERVLET functional tests are failed
>>>> (strict_servlet compliance)
>>>> 6878859 Tomcat should create pid file for monitoring by other
>>>> applications 6890019 Tomcat packaging should better support custom ROOT
>>>> web
>>>> application deployment
>>>> 6889510 tomcat 6 is built with wrong version info
>>>>
>>>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~xsumbe00/6890019-tomcat/
>>> The changes look good to me.
>>> +1
>> Thanks for looking at this! I had to update changes. Can you please look
>> at updated webrev?
> I have one question about the pid file.  Would it be better if the PID was 
> named catalina.pid instead of just pid?  This would be more consistent with 
> the log name of catalina.out and also other pid files in the system with the 
> format of {progname}.pid.

Since pid file location is now /var/tomcat6/logs/pid, I believe it's 
clear that it's Tomcat pid file (no need to mention Catalina).

I would prefer to leave it as it's now since PSARC/2009/563 which 
defines this location is already approved (and the idea of PID file was 
very controversial).

Thanks,

Petr

Reply via email to