Sounds good.

-- Seema.


Sunanda Menon wrote:
> Hi Seema ,
> 
> I have created the webrev again at 
> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~sunandam/6634053.Please review and also 
> please  see inline .
> 
> Thanks Sunanda
> 
> Sunanda Menon wrote:
>> Hi Seema ,
>>
>> Please see inline .
>>
>> Thanks Sunanda
>>
>> Seema Alevoor wrote:
>>   
>>> usr/src/cmd/mysql-5-0/Makefile.sfw :
>>>    - just curious, why is the below line needed ?
>>>                      find . -name core -exec rm -f {} \;
>>>     
>> This is from a previous putback in the gate and I have retained it .Can 
>> verify if we really need this .
>>

>>
>>   
> The earlier mysql 4.0 and the mysql5.0.4 have the line for removal of 
> core and hence this has been retained for mysql32 bit target as well .
> I see a core getting generated at under mysql-5.0.45/dbug and this line 
> removes that for 32 bit compilation .
> I don't intend to change this with this putback hence retained as is .
> 
> 
>>>    - build targets are "build_mysql32" and "build_mysql64" but install 
>>> and clean targets are "install32", "install64" and "clean32", "clean64".
>>>      To be consistent, you can change build targets as build32 and 
>>> build64.
>>>     
>> I can change this ...
>>   
> The target has been renamed as build32 and build64 respectively .
>>> usr/src/cmd/mysql-5-0/install-mysql-64 :
>>>    - install_dir function is not used anywhere in the script.
>>>
>>>    - In the comments, change the script name to "install-mysql-64"
>>>     
>> I would like to keep the definition as it is .Though the script does not 
>> call it but it just defines the install_dir function that can be used 
>> later if required .
>>   
> This definition as mentioned earlier has been retained .
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> webstack-discuss mailing list
> webstack-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/webstack-discuss

Reply via email to