Seema Alevoor wrote: > >> Apache Integration >> - PHP5 does deliver apache module as of Nevada build 76. However, we >> did not provide the necessary glue with respect to apache configuration >> by default. So, user will have to manually edit the apache configuration >> file so as to run PHP5 scripts. Going forward, with build 79, we would >> like to improve the user experience on this regard. So, with build 79, >> we would like to deliver the following >> 2 packages >> - 'SUNWapch22m-php5' >> - depends on SUNWphp524core and >> > > SUNWapch22usr > > It should depend on SUNWapch22u and not SUNWapch22usr > > Seema - thanks for correcting. Yes, I did meant to write as SUNWapch22u but ended up with a 'typo'. >> - delivers /usr/php5/5.2.4/lib/libphp5.so >> >> - and 'SUNWapch22r-php5' >> - depends on SUNWapch22r and SUNWphp524core >> - delivers /etc/apache/2.2/conf.d/php.conf >> >> > > Usually, a module will have a corresponding configuration file. So, why can't > a single > package include both .so and .conf ? > If I am not mistaken, as per packaging guidelines, a package cannot deliver both to /usr as well as to /etc. Hopefully, going forward, with Indiana this requirement won't exist. But, I guess, for now, we do need 2 packages - even though both of them deliver a single file each. > Will php.conf contain LoadModule directive ? > > That is what I am hoping for.
thanks sriram > _______________________________________________ > webstack-discuss mailing list > webstack-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/webstack-discuss >
