What I forgot, maybe another interesting number:

it’s  ~950 subscribers to the Webtest mailing list.



Cheers,

Martin



From: webtest-ad...@lists.canoo.com [mailto:webtest-ad...@lists.canoo.com]
On Behalf Of Dwayne Miller
Sent: Donnerstag, 20. März 2014 17:44
To: webtest@lists.canoo.com; Martin Huber
Subject: Re: [Webtest] What are the chances that webtest will be updated
to use htmlunit 2.14 ?



+1



Do they folks at Canoo have any stats on how many users of Webtest there
are?  How many downloads are occurring?, Etc.?  Does Canoo still use
Webtest in their projects?



From: Martin Huber <martin.hu...@canoo.com>
Reply-To: "webtest@lists.canoo.com" <webtest@lists.canoo.com>, Martin
Huber <martin.hu...@canoo.com>
Date: Thursday, March 20, 2014 at 10:29 AM
To: "webtest@lists.canoo.com" <webtest@lists.canoo.com>
Subject: RE: [Webtest] What are the chances that webtest will be updated
to use htmlunit 2.14 ?



Hi all,



WebTest is OpenSource as you know. If we would move the source code to
GitHub and make it easier for the community to do contributions on their
own – would some of you be able / willing to spend time in contributing?

I also believe it would be very sad to let WebTest die as its core idea
and concept still are very valid and helpful even in actual development
projects.



Could you give some feedback about if you could contribute?

Just send a “+1” to the list, so we see, if it will be worth moving the
project.



Cheers,

Martin





From: webtest-ad...@lists.canoo.com [mailto:webtest-ad...@lists.canoo.com]
On Behalf Of Michael Zwick
Sent: Donnerstag, 20. März 2014 14:18
To: webtest@lists.canoo.com
Subject: RE: [Webtest] What are the chances that webtest will be updated
to use htmlunit 2.14 ?



It’s quite the same for me. I’m still using Webtest. I think, it’s a very
good tool. So far I could cover all I wanted with it. Ease of use,
reporting, possibilities to structure the tests and reusing packages, all
that is just fine.

So, I don’t like to see it just fade away like that. Still I’m thinking
about moving over to another tool as there is no activity or progress
anymore.



Michael





From:webtest-ad...@lists.canoo.com [mailto:webtest-ad...@lists.canoo.com]
On Behalf Of Dwayne Miller
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 1:48 PM
To: webtest@lists.canoo.com
Subject: Re: [Webtest] What are the chances that webtest will be updated
to use htmlunit 2.14 ?



I happen to like using Webtest and find it truly disappointing that the
product has slipped into the state is has.  I wonder if the sponsors would
be willing to donate it or host it elsewhere… or if that would even help.
It is difficult for me to gauge the level of interest or use in the
product via this mailing list.  It was once much more active and leads me
to believe that most have moved to another tool.  I work with a test team
that are not developers, and the ability to write test scripts using Ant
XML is much easier for them to grasp than writing Java code.



I was able to get a version of Webtest running on htmlunit 2.12.  But the
changes in 2.14 and dependencies are a little more daunting and I have not
had the time required to get a good feel for how all of the pieces work
together so that I can make updates.



From: Parkin Roman <roman.par...@texunatech.com>
Organization: Texuna Technologies Ltd
Reply-To: "webtest@lists.canoo.com" <webtest@lists.canoo.com>,
"roman.par...@texunatech.com" <roman.par...@texunatech.com>
Date: Monday, March 17, 2014 at 9:47 AM
To: Webtest <webtest@lists.canoo.com>
Subject: [Webtest] What are the chances that webtest will be updated to
use htmlunit 2.14 ?



Hi all,

Webtest uses htmlunit 2.10.
What are the chances that webtest will be updated to use htmlunit 2.14
or we should migrate to other tools for automated testing of web
applications?

--
Best regards,
Roman Parkin
Testing Team Lead
Texuna Technologies Ltd <http://www.texunatech.com>

_______________________________________________ WebTest mailing list
WebTest@lists.canoo.com http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest

Disclaimer: This message is intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain information which is
privileged, confidential, proprietary, or exempt from disclosure under
applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or the person
responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are
strictly prohibited from disclosing, distributing, copying, or in any way
using this message. If you have received this communication in error,
please notify the sender and destroy and delete any copies you may have
received.

Reply via email to