The only fix we want is dealing with zombie sessions (sessions that
won't get pickled).

El mar, 14-01-2003 a las 00:56, Stuart Donaldson escribió:
> Anybody have any specific issues they would like to see solved before a
> near-term release?
> 
> I would like to try and get this includeURL issues resolved, and a couple of
> other little nits in myself. Is there anyone that is using includeURL,
> callMethodOfServlet, or forward() that has not had any trouble understanding
> what they did, or getting them to work as expected for more than one type of
> environment?
> 
> What if we shoot for bug fixes and other issues this week. Addressing only
> issues which either have had relatively straightforward patches posted, or
> been recently discussed (i.e.: the includeURL issue).
> 
> Next Sunday or Monday we roll a release candidate together and create a
> support branch in CVS for the release, putting the release candidate on the
> home page.
> 
> We only accept direct bug fixes on the release candidate branch, no
> alteration in functionality (i.e.: if we haven't already addressed the
> includeURL or psp-handler issues, then we would not introduce changes during
> the release-candidate phase because that has to do with interpreting what
> the correct behavior should be.)
> 
> The following week, we can put up the release.
> 
> Meanwhile, after the release candidate is in, because we've branched in CVS,
> we could be more aggressive about addressing some of the other issues which
> may be "nice-to-haves" or may be bugs or patches that have been reported,
> but have not had a direct effect on any of the developers.
> 
> Another strategy would be to pick a target release date for the next major
> release, and schedule a target pre-release prior to that to let things
> stabilize.
> 
> I am willing to run a near-term release unless someone else wants to do it.
> But I would require some feedback and review on both the release strategy,
> and what is going in at the last minute, as well as an agreement/consensus
> on any further changes we might want for this release.
> 
> -Stuart-
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Geoffrey Talvola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 7:55 AM
> > To: 'Stuart Donaldson'; Webware devel
> > Subject: RE: [Webware-devel] Moving towards a release.
> > 
> > 
> > Stuart Donaldson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > > Should we just jump in and make some of these changes?  Or 
> > should we 
> > > perhaps advertise a period where the CVS trunk may be a little less 
> > > stable?  Should we put up an interim snapshot tarball?
> > 
> > We could also just cut a release right now, with what's in 
> > CVS.  There are a
> > few things not working quite right and a lot more refinements 
> > we want to
> > make but no showshoppers that I know of.
> > 
> > At least that'd give us a news item to put on the Webware 
> > home page :-)
> > 
> > - Geoff
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE  SSL Guide from Thawte
> > are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE
> > Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your  SSL 
> > security issues.
> > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en
> > _______________________________________________
> > Webware-devel mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-devel
> > 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE  SSL Guide from Thawte
> are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE
> Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your  SSL security issues.
> http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en
> _______________________________________________
> Webware-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-devel
-- 
---
gpg --recv-keys --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net 047FFABB

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje esta firmada digitalmente

Reply via email to