On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 08:53, Tom von Schwerdtner wrote: > Q: Who are the folks who maintain the current site?
Currently the website is a module in the CVS repository, and some of the developers tweak it from time to time. No one seems to have really claimed it, as in regularly updating it and taking responsibility for the content. > Feel free to vote/comment/whatever on these: > > * It would be cool of the wiki was done with pydiddy (on this > self-hosting theme again). It needs a little work (caching and whatnot) > but it seems doable enough. Sure, though I'd really like a Wiki with reST -- I've written a rough one for a recent paper. I'll put it in the sandbox soon. I like reST, though of course it's not as flexible as HTML... I'm not sure how PyDiddy's markup is in that respect. > * Anything else people want in the website? Interface to the sandbox > perhaps? We should certainly reference the sandbox, and at some point we should have an index of things in the sandbox (though we're not there now). The whole thing could probably be organized better. > * How is the current website setup as far as maintaining it goes (how > are new news items added for example)? Is anyone particularly attached > to the current methods? Anyone prefer a specific alternative? It's written in SHTML in the CVS repository. I like that it's in CVS, but there's nothing special about it otherwise. If we were to stay with a static site, or at least a static front-section, it might be better to do it with Cheetah generating static HTML. Ian ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Webware-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-devel
