On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 04:43, Frank Barknecht wrote: > Although I wrote PyDiddy I would like a more cleaned up solution to > the Wiki. Ian's Wiki is much better written, the only problem it has > is that it's hard to install. PyDiddy was intended to 1) play around > with porting cgi to Webware and 2) work out of the box, i.e. no > SQL-db, no external dependencies outside Webware.
I've made another sort of proto-Wiki, available in the Sandbox (ianbicking/Wiki/Wiki.py). There's a simple Webware UI around the UI-independant library, but there's nothing special about it. It doesn't have a lot of features, because I was originally writing it as an example application for a paper. But I like it's basic structure, and adding more features shouldn't be too hard. It uses reST and probably requires docutils from CVS. It doesn't use a database -- in the previous implementation (actually no relation to this one) the database was used exclusively for searching (links, backlinks, titles, etc). That could probably be done by keeping index files, so it could be efficient without requiring a database. Ian ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Webware-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-devel
