Just to say here-here! I'd like to see this (and many more) full-scale examples of Webware-based applications, for non-gurus like myself who don't enjoy single-stepping through existing code (grin).
>Hi, > >starting on user management sounds like a good idea. I'd be interested in >builing a (at first primitive) document management system and usermanagement >is definatelly needed. >I'll post some ideas on the twiki about this during the next days. > >Stephan > >On Sunday 18 November 2001 00:51, you wrote: > > ok, > > > > i'm typing onehanded with a baby in my > > other arm so forgive the brevity. > > > > i think a good place to start is > > with some infrastructure i.e user > > management etc. There is > > some interest in the GNUe > > project re:groupware. they use > > python alot and some have played with > > webware. we may be able to collaorate a > > little on backend stuff. table > > design etc. the more open any project like > > this is the more resources we can attract. > > > > userkit seems to be not quite complete enuf > > as it uses middlekit for it's RDBMS persistance > > and middlekit is not feature complete yet. > > > > Groupware could be the "killer app" for > > webware. > > > > Darryl > > > > <More messages snipped> Robert K. Rickenbrode II [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Webware-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
