Geoffrey Talvola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > If Webware used some sort of process pool instead of a > thread pool, and served only one request per process, this > wouldn't be as much of a problem.
It could be interesting to investigate the tantalising, but still apparently obscure, POSH (poshmodule.sf.net) mechanism for sharing data between processes in an apparently "thread-like" fashion. Sadly, I don't have the time (or mandate) to look into that, but it could address the various scalability and reliability complaints that have come up, at least if it didn't disrupt the programming model employed by most Webware applications too much. On a more mundane level, I should really send some patches in around "classic" CGI environment variables, and possibly around URLs and paths, although I imagine that Ian Bicking's work probably conflicts with the latter somewhat. Paul ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here: http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 _______________________________________________ Webware-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
