Marc Saric wrote:
While fumbling around with validators I found, that they have two common disadvantages (for me):
1. The error-messages are hard-coded (i.e. english text). 2. Most of them actually test for two things at once, existance AND correct format of field-input.
The Validator/Converters are designed to be super-simple, and to be subclassed for custom application requirements (like output messages). Sounds like you did just that.
We do intend to change them so that they can be empty if there is a validator involved, and still pass (ie, the validator only runs if there is input). That will happen when/if we ever get it together to make another release.
You're not the first one to run into this problem, incidentally.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________
Webware-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
