I'm leaving this to those who know your specific console. It seems as though the rain is being counted and totalled in two places somehow - perhaps within the driver and also when the archive record is created. I'll leave it to Matthew and Tom and those more knowledgeable than me. The counting difference will certainly be being caused by the Nulls - which won't be counted.
ps -A I think is the command you are looking for On Thursday, 5 January 2017 14:53:30 UTC+2, [email protected] wrote: > The archives doesn't include the value 0 because with the 2.7 version, I > add a minimum of limitation in weewx.conf to 0.001 mm due to rain error > calculation. I also did the same thing with the wind. > In the xls file, all the empty lignes are fill as '*NULL*' in the > recorded data and archives. > > Normally, I get only one instance of weewx. Weewx is running on a > raspberry. I already reboot the system. Do you know how see all programs > are running? > > Le jeudi 5 janvier 2017 13:01:55 UTC+1, Andrew Milner a écrit : >> >> Something else does not look quite right with your archive_day_rain >> table. I would have expected the min to have been 0 unless it really did >> rain in every archive record (which it didn't according to your >> spreadsheet. My table always has a zero for min. >> >> Are you sure that you have only got one instance of weewx running? It is >> starting to look as though somewhere,somehow your archive records are being >> counted and totalled twice. Personally I have not seen or heard of that >> issue before. >> >> Sorry - I will have to let Matthew and/or Tom come to your rescue!! >> >> >> >> On Thursday, 5 January 2017 13:33:47 UTC+2, Andrew Milner wrote: >> >>> Looking at my archive_day_rain table the count is usually = 288 which is >>> the number of archive records per day. I archive every 5 minutes (= 12/.hr >>> = 12*24/day = 288 per day) The sum = the total of the data from the >>> archive records for that day which starts at dateTime column >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thursday, 5 January 2017 13:22:46 UTC+2, [email protected] wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Le jeudi 5 janvier 2017 10:49:44 UTC+1, Andrew Milner a écrit : >>>>> >>>>> So you are saying that the sum of the archived data in the archive >>>>> table for the calendar day does not equal the value in the sum column in >>>>> the archive_day-rain table? >>>>> >>>> Yes. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Does the value in he count column of archive_day_rain contain the >>>>> correct number of archive records for the day which have been totalled to >>>>> form the sum value?? >>>>> >>>> No I get 14 then archive_day_rain gives 28. See in the xls files in >>>> attached. >>>> What is the link between the sum of rain in a day and the number of >>>> rain recorded in this day ? >>>> >>>> rds >>>> Lio >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thursday, 5 January 2017 10:41:03 UTC+2, [email protected] wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hello, >>>>>> Ok for this part of configuration. >>>>>> >>>>>> And concerning the sum of of the rain for a day, have you seen my >>>>>> remarks in my last post? >>>>>> in summary, the SQL file (weewx.sdb), is made of different tables. >>>>>> One is all the stored data (called archive), and others which are >>>>>> statistics calculated by weewx. >>>>>> >>>>>> When I calculate the rain fallen during a day from the stored data, >>>>>> this result which is closed to the other local weather station, is the >>>>>> half >>>>>> of the value calculated by weewx which is stored in the archive_day_rain >>>>>> table. From my point of view there is a mistake when weewx calculates >>>>>> the >>>>>> rain fallen during a day. >>>>>> >>>>>> rds >>>>>> lio >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Le jeudi 5 janvier 2017 04:46:38 UTC+1, Andrew Milner a écrit : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If your database is metric then rain is in cm >>>>>>> If your database is metricwx then rain is mm >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Your NOAA report is, according to the title line above the table, in >>>>>>> mm - but the units are determined by the contents of the template and >>>>>>> so >>>>>>> can easily be changed to other units by changing the template >>>>>>> appropriately. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://weewx.com/docs/customizing.htm#units >>>>>>> <http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fweewx.com%2Fdocs%2Fcustomizing.htm%23units&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNHIPWGJUzXyeLDRewYXGmH3AhHQZg> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thursday, 5 January 2017 00:19:57 UTC+2, [email protected] wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Le mercredi 4 janvier 2017 00:38:20 UTC+1, mwall a écrit : >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 at 5:47:04 PM UTC-5, lionel.sylvie >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This is the same corrections in the weewx.conf between versions. >>>>>>>>>> Where I can find the commits? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> the change to rain multiplier happened on 11 jun 2015: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/weewx/weewx/commit/0bb7db1edc806caebe68357bc315ccf8674eea52 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> so it has been part of the ws23xx driver for some time now. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> the divide-by-ten happens only to data from the logger, so if you >>>>>>>>> are using record_generation=hardware you will definitely see a >>>>>>>>> difference, >>>>>>>>> but if you are using record_generation=software you will see a >>>>>>>>> difference >>>>>>>>> only when weewx has to do catchup. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I compare all the versions of the WS23xx I used since 2.7, all >>>>>>>> are similar concerning the formula. The x10 in the commit above >>>>>>>> concern the >>>>>>>> wind speed which is included after the 2.7 version. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> To come back to my original question, it's concern not the >>>>>>>> generated data but the values shown in the NOAA files. >>>>>>>> In the file attached in this post NOAA of November, when we take >>>>>>>> the rain value for the 24 November 2016, this is 24.9mm. When we take >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> value in the database (weewx.sdb) for the same date ("1479942000" : >>>>>>>> Sat Nov >>>>>>>> 24 2016 00:00:00 GMT+0100), the value is 2.486. Is it the same units? >>>>>>>> From a report of an official station close to mine (4-5kms), the >>>>>>>> cumul was 11.2mm. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.infoclimat.fr/observations-meteo/archives/24/novembre/2016/saint-martin-d-heres/00014.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> When I do the sum of the rain falls during this same day (data >>>>>>>> taken in the archive table of weewx.sdb), I get 1.243 which is the >>>>>>>> half >>>>>>>> value form the archive_day_rain. Is it normal ? >>>>>>>> When I sum all the rain data for November 2016 coming from the >>>>>>>> archive (= 8.029) and compare to the sum of the archive_day_rain for >>>>>>>> November (=16.058) and the NOAA of November (=160.6mm), I get a double >>>>>>>> value for the archive_day_rain and NOAA. Is there any issue during the >>>>>>>> calculation of the archive ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> rds >>>>>>>> Lio >>>>>>>> PS : After these all analysis, the archive_day_rain is in cm and >>>>>>>> the NOAA is in mm. True? then I get the explanation for the x10 >>>>>>>> between >>>>>>>> values of archive_day_rain and NOAA. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
