Did you delete-daily before you backfilled-daily??
On Thursday, 5 January 2017 15:34:34 UTC+2, Andrew Milner wrote: > I'm leaving this to those who know your specific console. It seems as > though the rain is being counted and totalled in two places somehow - > perhaps within the driver and also when the archive record is created. > I'll leave it to Matthew and Tom and those more knowledgeable than me. The > counting difference will certainly be being caused by the Nulls - which > won't be counted. > > ps -A I think is the command you are looking for > > > > > > On Thursday, 5 January 2017 14:53:30 UTC+2, [email protected] wrote: > >> The archives doesn't include the value 0 because with the 2.7 version, I >> add a minimum of limitation in weewx.conf to 0.001 mm due to rain error >> calculation. I also did the same thing with the wind. >> In the xls file, all the empty lignes are fill as '*NULL*' in the >> recorded data and archives. >> >> Normally, I get only one instance of weewx. Weewx is running on a >> raspberry. I already reboot the system. Do you know how see all programs >> are running? >> >> Le jeudi 5 janvier 2017 13:01:55 UTC+1, Andrew Milner a écrit : >>> >>> Something else does not look quite right with your archive_day_rain >>> table. I would have expected the min to have been 0 unless it really did >>> rain in every archive record (which it didn't according to your >>> spreadsheet. My table always has a zero for min. >>> >>> Are you sure that you have only got one instance of weewx running? It >>> is starting to look as though somewhere,somehow your archive records are >>> being counted and totalled twice. Personally I have not seen or heard of >>> that issue before. >>> >>> Sorry - I will have to let Matthew and/or Tom come to your rescue!! >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thursday, 5 January 2017 13:33:47 UTC+2, Andrew Milner wrote: >>> >>>> Looking at my archive_day_rain table the count is usually = 288 which >>>> is the number of archive records per day. I archive every 5 minutes (= >>>> 12/.hr = 12*24/day = 288 per day) The sum = the total of the data from >>>> the >>>> archive records for that day which starts at dateTime column >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thursday, 5 January 2017 13:22:46 UTC+2, [email protected] wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Le jeudi 5 janvier 2017 10:49:44 UTC+1, Andrew Milner a écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>> So you are saying that the sum of the archived data in the archive >>>>>> table for the calendar day does not equal the value in the sum column in >>>>>> the archive_day-rain table? >>>>>> >>>>> Yes. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Does the value in he count column of archive_day_rain contain the >>>>>> correct number of archive records for the day which have been totalled >>>>>> to >>>>>> form the sum value?? >>>>>> >>>>> No I get 14 then archive_day_rain gives 28. See in the xls files in >>>>> attached. >>>>> What is the link between the sum of rain in a day and the number of >>>>> rain recorded in this day ? >>>>> >>>>> rds >>>>> Lio >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thursday, 5 January 2017 10:41:03 UTC+2, [email protected] wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>> Ok for this part of configuration. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And concerning the sum of of the rain for a day, have you seen my >>>>>>> remarks in my last post? >>>>>>> in summary, the SQL file (weewx.sdb), is made of different tables. >>>>>>> One is all the stored data (called archive), and others which are >>>>>>> statistics calculated by weewx. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> When I calculate the rain fallen during a day from the stored data, >>>>>>> this result which is closed to the other local weather station, is the >>>>>>> half >>>>>>> of the value calculated by weewx which is stored in the >>>>>>> archive_day_rain >>>>>>> table. From my point of view there is a mistake when weewx calculates >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> rain fallen during a day. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> rds >>>>>>> lio >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Le jeudi 5 janvier 2017 04:46:38 UTC+1, Andrew Milner a écrit : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If your database is metric then rain is in cm >>>>>>>> If your database is metricwx then rain is mm >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Your NOAA report is, according to the title line above the table, >>>>>>>> in mm - but the units are determined by the contents of the template >>>>>>>> and so >>>>>>>> can easily be changed to other units by changing the template >>>>>>>> appropriately. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://weewx.com/docs/customizing.htm#units >>>>>>>> <http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fweewx.com%2Fdocs%2Fcustomizing.htm%23units&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNHIPWGJUzXyeLDRewYXGmH3AhHQZg> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thursday, 5 January 2017 00:19:57 UTC+2, [email protected] >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Le mercredi 4 janvier 2017 00:38:20 UTC+1, mwall a écrit : >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 at 5:47:04 PM UTC-5, lionel.sylvie >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> This is the same corrections in the weewx.conf between versions. >>>>>>>>>>> Where I can find the commits? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> the change to rain multiplier happened on 11 jun 2015: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/weewx/weewx/commit/0bb7db1edc806caebe68357bc315ccf8674eea52 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> so it has been part of the ws23xx driver for some time now. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> the divide-by-ten happens only to data from the logger, so if you >>>>>>>>>> are using record_generation=hardware you will definitely see a >>>>>>>>>> difference, >>>>>>>>>> but if you are using record_generation=software you will see a >>>>>>>>>> difference >>>>>>>>>> only when weewx has to do catchup. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I compare all the versions of the WS23xx I used since 2.7, all >>>>>>>>> are similar concerning the formula. The x10 in the commit above >>>>>>>>> concern the >>>>>>>>> wind speed which is included after the 2.7 version. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> To come back to my original question, it's concern not the >>>>>>>>> generated data but the values shown in the NOAA files. >>>>>>>>> In the file attached in this post NOAA of November, when we take >>>>>>>>> the rain value for the 24 November 2016, this is 24.9mm. When we take >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> value in the database (weewx.sdb) for the same date ("1479942000" : >>>>>>>>> Sat Nov >>>>>>>>> 24 2016 00:00:00 GMT+0100), the value is 2.486. Is it the same units? >>>>>>>>> From a report of an official station close to mine (4-5kms), the >>>>>>>>> cumul was 11.2mm. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://www.infoclimat.fr/observations-meteo/archives/24/novembre/2016/saint-martin-d-heres/00014.html >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> When I do the sum of the rain falls during this same day (data >>>>>>>>> taken in the archive table of weewx.sdb), I get 1.243 which is the >>>>>>>>> half >>>>>>>>> value form the archive_day_rain. Is it normal ? >>>>>>>>> When I sum all the rain data for November 2016 coming from the >>>>>>>>> archive (= 8.029) and compare to the sum of the archive_day_rain for >>>>>>>>> November (=16.058) and the NOAA of November (=160.6mm), I get a >>>>>>>>> double >>>>>>>>> value for the archive_day_rain and NOAA. Is there any issue during >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> calculation of the archive ? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> rds >>>>>>>>> Lio >>>>>>>>> PS : After these all analysis, the archive_day_rain is in cm and >>>>>>>>> the NOAA is in mm. True? then I get the explanation for the x10 >>>>>>>>> between >>>>>>>>> values of archive_day_rain and NOAA. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
