I do not think weewx reads LOOP2 packets - so none of the LOOP2 data is 
available.



On Monday, 29 July 2019 12:54:52 UTC+3, Praveen Chandrasekaran wrote:
>
> Looking at below:
>
>
> https://feedback.weather.com/customer/en/portal/articles/2924682-pws-upload-protocol?b_id=17298
>  
>
> WU expects wind speed average over 2 min average and 10 min gusts and 
> instantaneous speed. Did something change in this recently? Looking at 
> weewx code from restx.py I am not sure if weewx uploads all these? 
>
> https://github.com/weewx/weewx/blob/master/bin/weewx/restx.py  
>
> winddir - [0-360 instantaneous wind direction]
> windspeedmph - [mph instantaneous wind speed]
> windgustmph - [mph current wind gust, using software specific time period]
> windgustdir - [0-360 using software specific time period]
> windspdmph_avg2m  - [mph 2 minute average wind speed mph]
> winddir_avg2m - [0-360 2 minute average wind direction]
> windgustmph_10m - [mph past 10 minutes wind gust mph ]
> windgustdir_10m - [0-360 past 10 minutes wind gust direction]
>
>
> On Mon, 29 Jul 2019 at 15:10, Praveen Chandrasekaran <prave...@gmail.com 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> Hmm. Will try. Before the WU overhaul it was showing them separately on 
>> the graph though. The gust value from LOOP2 seems to be 10 min wind gust 
>> while the wind speed sent out is the instantaneous wind speed from LOOP 
>> packet I believe? This may explain why wind speed and wind gust are same in 
>> graph. But then how does the table have different values. U never know with 
>> WU! :)  
>>
>> As you mentioned will set debug=1 and observe sometime.  
>>
>> On Mon, 29 Jul 2019 at 12:29, Andrew Milner <andrew....@gmail.com 
>> <javascript:>> wrote:
>>
>>> I really do not see how you can have a meaningful gust value from 
>>> readings submitted every few seconds!!  I see from the Davis comms protocol 
>>> the gust values are in LOOP2 packets and the smallest appears to be a 2 
>>> minute gust value.
>>>
>>> Setting debug=1 may shed more light on what is actually being sent to WU
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Monday, 29 July 2019 09:24:19 UTC+3, Praveen Chandrasekaran wrote:
>>>>
>>>> My weather station is Davis Vantage Vue. I believe it never emits 
>>>> partial packets.
>>>>
>>>> On Friday, 26 July 2019 15:02:51 UTC+5:30, Andrew Milner wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> i doubt it very much.  what weather station do you have?
>>>>> changing the rf frequency changes the upload to wu interval but the 
>>>>> station will still be being polled as before.  Does the station provide 
>>>>> the 
>>>>> gust value in the LOOP data?  If not then the gust value is an artificial 
>>>>> one created by weewx from loop records wind speeds received.  If your 
>>>>> station provides partial packets as LOOP data you could always try and 
>>>>> set 
>>>>> the wu flag that set specifies windGust must be present before rf is 
>>>>> uploaded
>>>>>
>>>>> On Friday, 26 July 2019 10:42:14 UTC+3, Praveen Chandrasekaran wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If I set rtfreq to a higher value like 5 seconds, should that resolve 
>>>>>> the issue? 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 at 11:57, Andrew Milner <andrew....@gmail.com> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> if from rf it has no gusts it cannot graph them.  non rf sites will 
>>>>>>> provide a gust value per archive interval.  who knows what wu do when 
>>>>>>> they 
>>>>>>> receive both rf and archive record data!!  The tables may well create 
>>>>>>> an 
>>>>>>> artificial gust value from rf speeds, but again who knows what wu use 
>>>>>>> to 
>>>>>>> create the graphs!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Friday, 26 July 2019 09:01:30 UTC+3, Praveen Chandrasekaran wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The table somehow has it right. The graph alone is wrong.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 at 11:29, Andrew Milner <andrew....@gmail.com> 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I would suspect WU ignore windgust on rapidfire because you need a 
>>>>>>>>> sustained period of I think 3 seconds for the gust to count as a gust 
>>>>>>>>> in 
>>>>>>>>> metereological definitions - and the rf interval is probably too 
>>>>>>>>> short - so 
>>>>>>>>> gust will always equal speed in rf situations.  
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 26 July 2019 08:26:49 UTC+3, Praveen Chandrasekaran 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Related wxforum post:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.wxforum.net/index.php?topic=36611.msg386071#msg386071
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 26 July 2019 10:45:52 UTC+5:30, Praveen Chandrasekaran 
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I am seeing that on stations with rapdifire, WU is not 
>>>>>>>>>>> differentiating wind speed and wind gust in graph correctly. 
>>>>>>>>>>> However in 
>>>>>>>>>>> stations without rapidfire it is fine.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Example my station with rapidfire:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.wunderground.com/dashboard/pws/IBANGALO9
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Another station without rapidfire:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.wunderground.com/dashboard/pws/IMUMBAI16
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Is this issue arising from weewx by any chance?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> Praveen
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in 
>>>>>>>>> the Google Groups "weewx-user" group.
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/weewx-user/E5uzJiv_ThY/unsubscribe
>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email 
>>>>>>>>> to weewx...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/51caf745-7385-40f9-ad35-81cfed29553e%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/51caf745-7385-40f9-ad35-81cfed29553e%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in 
>>>>>>> the Google Groups "weewx-user" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/weewx-user/E5uzJiv_ThY/unsubscribe
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
>>>>>>> weewx...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/e1c86274-2f2a-4005-a3e3-8ac0d9028b66%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/e1c86274-2f2a-4005-a3e3-8ac0d9028b66%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
>>> Google Groups "weewx-user" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/weewx-user/E5uzJiv_ThY/unsubscribe.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
>>> weewx...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/7d2e07d8-d98a-41b3-a3b4-0c9cdcea6f25%40googlegroups.com
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/7d2e07d8-d98a-41b3-a3b4-0c9cdcea6f25%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to weewx-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/d45f2b44-eb35-4eda-a1e3-653aeb7bdece%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to