Thank you Gary. I use "prefer_hardware", so I am very confident the expression will do what I want to achieve.
gjr80 schrieb am Sonntag, 27. Dezember 2020 um 13:23:07 UTC+1: > If extraHumid1 and outHumidity are not in that same loop packet then a > correction expression will have no effect on the loop packet. If you are > using hardware record generation then the correction will be applied to the > archive record as well so that may do what you want for archive records. If > you are using software record generation then no corrections are applied to > archive records. > > Gary > > On Sunday, 27 December 2020 at 22:14:36 UTC+10 michael.k...@gmx.at wrote: > >> >> But thinking further I have another question: will [[Corrections]] work >> with every loop package or every archive interval or both? If on every loop >> package is archive value computed from the loop data a mix of both sensors, >> since the sensors won't deliver their readings with the same loop package? >> Or won't outHumidity be affected at all, because the never is a extraHumid1 >> value available? >> michael.k...@gmx.at schrieb am Sonntag, 27. Dezember 2020 um 12:58:47 >> UTC+1: >> >>> >>> Good Question. Since I am currently only thinking about how everything >>> *could >>> *work out, I can't answer this at the moment. But I guess my question >>> is answered. If there would be an error, how would one handle it? Or is a >>> "nasty" log an no effect on "outHumidity" all? >>> gjr80 schrieb am Sonntag, 27. Dezember 2020 um 12:50:51 UTC+1: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> You want something like: >>>> >>>> outHumidity = outHumidity if extraHumid1 is None else extraHumid1 >>>> >>>> My only question is what behaviour do you see when extraHumid1 is not >>>> provided; is extraHumid1 set to None (in which case the above will work as >>>> you want) or is extraHumid1 omitted from the packet (in which case the >>>> above will produce an error and have no effect on outHumidity (which >>>> arguably is what you want)). >>>> >>>> Gary >>>> >>>> On Sunday, 27 December 2020 at 21:22:34 UTC+10 michael.k...@gmx.at >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Let's say I have two sensors, "outHumidity" and "extraHumid1". >>>>> "outHumidity" ist a sensor that delivers data very reliable but not >>>>> very precise measurements, it's the stations built-in sensor. >>>>> "extraHumid1" delivers data a little less reliable, but very precise >>>>> values. It's a custom built ESP8266 using a SHT35, sending data over MQTT. >>>>> >>>>> Is it possible to prefer extraHumid1 over outHumidity, if there are >>>>> extraHumid1 values in the archive Interval? If not, use outHumidity? >>>>> >>>>> Something like >>>>> [[Corrections]] >>>>> outHumidity = if extraHumid1 == 'None' outHumidity else extraHumid1 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to weewx-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/8de9a1f2-e70e-4010-a8ff-31f9e92ed07fn%40googlegroups.com.
