Eric K <eric.koes...@gmail.com> writes: > Yeah, I agree conversion is not the best way to obtain the solar radiation > value. > Lux is all Acurite provides us. > > I found several places where the sunlight-specific conversion value of of > 1/126.7 (or 0.00789) was referenced, so I went with that. > https://help.ambientweather.net/help/why-is-the-lux-to-w-m-2-conversion-factor-126-7 > https://cumulus.hosiene.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=3979
I added those links to the wiki page. Agreed that for bright full sun conversions based on an assumed spectral distribution are not ridiculous. It would be really interesting if someone with both kinds of sensors (both high quality!) were to post a scatter plot of one vs the other. I expect good agreement about 500 W/m^2, and much less by the time one gets to 100 W/m^2. But I am just guessing. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to weewx-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/rmiy2cbis6a.fsf%40s1.lexort.com.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
