Ah, does that bring up the "you dirty whore" warning page?
The only stuff I ever see with NSFW on it involves shaved starlet pudenda. Not *see* see, 'cause that would be feeding the celebrity beast, but you know, ACCIDENTALLY...you're not buying this are you? On 2/21/07, Daria Akers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
NSFW!!!! But funny as hell!!! My thought is that the real organ would have structural failure before the one used in the experiment. Not even 10 would be my guess. On 2/21/07, Hannah Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://www.myscienceproject.org/condoms.html > >
