I used to work for a dot com that kept track of traffic on the internet (kinda like neilsen rating but for the web) and I was paid to surf the net. I remember when we were getting ready to start keeping track of streaming videos we had to visit the top 5000 sites... Well 1/2 of religious and the other 1/2 are SMUT. I took all the porn and my very religious coworker did all of the religious sites. We were a perfect match. You wouldn't believe what is out there (actually YOU probably would.) Daria
On 2/21/07, Hannah Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ah, does that bring up the "you dirty whore" warning page? The only stuff I ever see with NSFW on it involves shaved starlet pudenda. Not *see* see, 'cause that would be feeding the celebrity beast, but you know, ACCIDENTALLY...you're not buying this are you? On 2/21/07, Daria Akers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > NSFW!!!! > But funny as hell!!! > My thought is that the real organ would have structural failure before > the one used in the experiment. Not even 10 would be my guess. > > > On 2/21/07, Hannah Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > http://www.myscienceproject.org/condoms.html > > > > >
-- http://mommadaria.blogspot.com - kid's music review http://dariaakers.blogspot.com -grown up topics
