Good idea, but I think that's kind of a lot to try to fit on an address label. Checks maybe, but labels is kind of pushing it. They do have an elegant calligraphy monogram, though. Absolutely nothing that would indicate they are from Entertainment Weekly, as opposed to the ASPCA ones, which have puppies and kitties. I guess if you are going to send charity labels you might as well indicate somehow what the charity is or it defeats the purpose.
--- In [email protected], "Daria Akers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Do they have photos of celebs like Brad Pitt and Angela Jolie, maybe > Madonna, or the cast from Lost? It's kinda a nice idea since you probably > don't have address labels yet. > > On 8/1/07, Ellen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Entertainment Weekly sent me free return address labels as a > > housewarming gift because I was generous enough to send them my new > > address. Finally, labels without an ulterior motive! I mean they want > > me to continue to be a subscriber, but it's not the same thing. Now > > THESE I might actually use because I don't feel like they are taking > > my donation and wasting it on labels rather than giving it to people > > in need. I don't have a problem with for-profit companies doing this > > AFTER I have already purchased the product. It's just sending them in > > ANTICIPATION of a future donation that I may or may not give, and > > probably won't if they bribe me with labels, that I have a problem > > with. So good for EW for figuring out the right way to drum up > > business using address labels. Use them as a reward, not as a bribe. > > >
