Ugh, I ment deployment and not integration. I've just been assuming that those tools were used in that process...
--nahum On Feb 7, 2014 11:53 PM, "Jeremy Olliver" <[email protected]> wrote: > I believe most chef or puppet deployment usage is in a continuous > deployment manner (deploying latest passing builds from a CI server). > > We're still using chef to setup a server, but Capistrano v2 (with our own > extension gem easy-deployment) to deploy. > > Something else worth looking at is recap, which is Capistrano (2?) under > the hood, but rewrites tasks for speed - no releases dir, directly runs the > app from the git clone, and only bundle or asset if the relevant files have > changed. Obviously it comes with some fairly heavy choices/conventions to > support this. Codeclimate have a blog post on the topic I think. > > Cheers, > Jeremy > > On Friday, February 7, 2014, Nahum Wild <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I've heard of Chef and/or Puppet being used. >> >> Anyone know what do the continuous integration tools use? >> >> >> --nahum >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Will Bryant <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> What are people using for deploying their apps these days? >>> >>> The current maintainer of Capistrano has based v3 on a GPLed library >>> (SSHkit) and his lawyers and ours have a difference of opinion as to >>> whether this makes Capistrano GPL too ( >>> https://github.com/capistrano/capistrano/issues/926). I find the >>> advice he has received from his company's lawyers surprising as to me it >>> implies the see the GPL as the same as the LGPL, which it certainly is not. >>> Would be interested to hear if anyone else has had their lawyers look at >>> this... >>> >>> So anyway, we wouldn't want to take that risk, so what other options are >>> there we should be considering these days? >>> >>> Vlad the Deployer had some good stuff when it came out but looking at >>> the current readme and recent commits I get the impression it has fallen >>> out of date a bit. >>> >>> There is Mina which I just heard of today, but I haven't tried it. >>> >>> Any others we should be looking at? >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "WellRailed" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wellrailed. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "WellRailed" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wellrailed. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> > > > -- > Jeremy Olliver > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "WellRailed" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wellrailed. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "WellRailed" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wellrailed. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
