I second this suggestion - it allows sufficient freedom to express meaningful content, since anything that would push us into an R rating would be very awkward to try and express within wesnoth.
Furthermore, it offers an extremely large body of work to act as a "legal precedent," per se - we can look at general examples of things in movies to judge whether something is appropriate/inappropriate. Obviously, there have been gross inconsistencies in how the MPAA has applied their ratings, but they've done a reasonably good job, as well as any human beings could be expected to. That is to say, it greatly clarifies what is/isn't appropriate, so that we'd be less likely to repeat this inane discussion (is this the third time this has rolled around? Fourth? Thirtieth?). > So the policy guideline I suggest is: BfW contentent must be > compatible > with a an MPAA PG-13 or ESRB "T" rating. _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list Wesnoth-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
