On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 08:24:12PM +0000, Jens Seidel wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 07:30:11PM +0100, Mark de Wever wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 07:02:38PM +0100, jeremy rosen wrote: > > > I'll just reply about the boost part... > > > > > > yes it was discussed, and the idea of adding BOOST was accepted on > > > principle > > I do not remember any discussion on this list ...
It was [1]. Also we already use some boost stuff, but it has been copied to the source tree. At least lexical_cast with some nice enhancements. > As far as I know Boost has no stable API or ABI. Be prepared to depend > on a single library version which may not be included in any distribution. > > I also noticed that many Boost maintainers do not respond and others > don't want to commit bug fixes for other libraries. Even many very simple > patches for build errors are ignored. Any references for these claims? Regards, Mark de Wever [1] https://mail.gna.org/public/wesnoth-dev/2007-05/msg00110.html _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list Wesnoth-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
