oh, Ok.... I assumed they followed the debian policy which has 1.2 in stable/testing/unstable and 1.3 in experimental...
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * jeremy rosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-26 15:29:49 CET]: > > I am writing this here because I am not sure of our status wrt the > > UBUNTU linux distribution > > It's not too hard to check - rmadison from the devscripts package is > your friend. > > > Ubuntu Hardy Heron is planned for end of April, and is currently in > > feature freeze. > > > > since 1.4 is not out yet, they will probably ship 1.2... a month after > > the 1.2 server has been shut and we stop supporting it. Not really a > > good situation. > > They can't propably ship 1.2, because they already contain 1.3.19: > > #v+ > $> rmadison -u ubuntu -s hardy wesnoth > wesnoth | 1:1.2.8-1 | hardy/universe | i386 > wesnoth | 1:1.3.19-1 | hardy/universe | source, amd64, powerpc > #v- > > > I think we should apply for a freeze exception now, or once 1.4 is out, > > but I am not sure what process to follow > > I have contact to some ubuntu people too, will query them with respect > to this, but as 1.3.19 is said to be compatible with 1.4 (and I > expect/hope that the version check code for the server does know about > that?) there shouldn't be too much problems even if they won't follow > the 1.4 upload? Besides, I know nothing about how their freeze actually > works. > > So long, > Rhonda > > _______________________________________________ > Wesnoth-dev mailing list > Wesnoth-dev@gna.org > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev >
_______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list Wesnoth-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
