On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Charles Dang <[email protected]> wrote:
> I support the idea of moving to GitHub's bug tracker. GNA's is simply too > outdated to use. Even I, a developer, feel put off by its interface. > Imagine how new or potential reporters react. > > IIRC, there were two main issues with moving to GitHub: > > * Registration > * No non-image uploads > > With regard to the first item, forcing user registration is already a current problem for us: http://forums.wesnoth.org/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=39068&p=569471&hilit=british+slang#p569471 So I don't, personally, see it as any barrier. The no non-image uploads is a much bigger deal, IMO. Here is an official response I received after inquiring about it: On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Scott Sanicki (GitHub Staff) < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi George, > > Thanks for getting in touch! We don't support issue attachments that are > not images right now, but that's a popular feature request, and we are > tracking it. I can't promise we'll implement it, but we're definitely > considering it. > > Cheers, > Scott > I guess that leaves us with three options: 1) Use Issues anyway because of GitHub integration/interface and use some workaround for bug reports that need save files. 2) Someone has time to make Redmine work. 3) Stick with GNA as is until another option arises, which will either be soonish or not until after the next stable release. Regarding other options, I saw ZenHub ( https://www.zenhub.io/ ) claim to support similar GitHub integration, bug report attachments and it claims to be free for open source projects but I haven't looked into it much as of yet. George (happygrue/Wintermute)
_______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
