Lachlan Hunt wrote:
see no problem with defining error handling for broken
documents, but no need to break conformance with SGML in the process.
HTML is an application of SGML, regardless of all the broken
implementations and documents we currently have, and I don't want to see
that changed.
An innocent question (no flamewar intended): What is the benefit of
having HTML defined as an application of SGML ?
regards
Olav Junker KjÃr
- Re: [whatwg] [html5] tags, elements and generated DO... Lachlan Hunt
- Re: [whatwg] [html5] tags, elements and generat... Ian Hickson
- Re: [whatwg] [html5] tags, elements and gen... Lachlan Hunt
- Re: [whatwg] [html5] tags, elements and... Anne van Kesteren
- Re: [whatwg] [html5] tags, elements and... Jim Ley
- Re: [whatwg] [html5] tags, elements and... Anne van Kesteren
- Re: [whatwg] [html5] tags, elements and... Lachlan Hunt
- Re: [whatwg] [html5] tags, elements and... Anne van Kesteren
- Re: [whatwg] [html5] tags, elements and... Lachlan Hunt
- Re: [whatwg] [html5] tags, elements and... Olav Junker KjÃr
- Re: [whatwg] [html5] tags, elements and... Lachlan Hunt
- Re: [whatwg] [html5] tags, elements and... Anne van Kesteren
- Re: [whatwg] [html5] tags, elements and... Henri Sivonen
- Re: [whatwg] [html5] tags, elements and... Jim Ley
- Re: [whatwg] [html5] tags, elements and... Henri Sivonen
- Re: [whatwg] [html5] tags, elements and... Jim Ley
- Re: [whatwg] [html5] tags, elements and... Henri Sivonen
- Re: [whatwg] [html5] tags, elements and... Olav Junker KjÃr
- Re: [whatwg] [html5] tags, elements and... Lachlan Hunt
- Re: [whatwg] [html5] tags, elements and... Anne van Kesteren