Alexey Feldgendler wrote: > On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 17:25:12 +0600, Matthew Raymond > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hmm... Is <img> ever non-presentational? Radical thought: Deprecate >> <img>. > > Why? Aren't there semantic images?
Might be. As Anne suggests, a picture of a product might be a good example. It was more of a question than a serious suggestion. > Maybe instead deprecate <img> for presentational images, leaving it only > for semantic images (with non-empty alt required). Sounds like a good idea. We should probably also consider how <object> fits into this, though. Can it completely replace <img>??? It certainly has better support for fallback content.
