Anne van Kesteren wrote: > Quoting Matthew Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Hmm... Is <img> ever non-presentational? Radical thought: Deprecate >> <img>. > > A company logo?
You could make an argument that trademarks have semantic value, but it's kinda weak, because you can identify the company by name as well. Here's some markup: | <h1 style="content: url(logo.png)">Company Name</h1> (Not sure I got the CSS right, but you get the idea.) > A picture of a new product some review is about? Much better example. That probably is semantic, yes. However, is there any situation where <object> couldn't be used instead of <img>?