On Nov 9, 2006, at 16:07, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
Since (a & b) is equivalent to (a, b)|(b, a), aren't both of those equivalent as well?
That's one of the limitations of DTDs. :-)In RELAX NG & means a real interleave, so the above equivalence holds if a and b are terminals but doesn't hold if a and b are non- terminals that expand with + or *.
-- Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
