Or what makes you want to cannibalize an existing W3C Recommendation which predates the formation of WHAT-WG? > Explain to me why Web Forms 2.0 shouldn't be "incorporating more of the great ideas" in XForms-Tiny rather than the other way around. Why is your approach to cannibalize an existing W3C working draft to enrich a draft you haven't even finished yet? What, in your opinion, makes WF2 unsalvageable?
- Re: [whatwg] Comparison of XForms-Tiny and WF2 Klotz, Leigh
- Re: [whatwg] Comparison of XForms-Tiny and WF2 Anne van Kesteren
- Re: [whatwg] Comparison of XForms-Tiny and WF2 Klotz, Leigh
- Re: [whatwg] Comparison of XForms-Tiny and ... Matthew Raymond
- Re: [whatwg] Comparison of XForms-Tiny ... Elliotte Harold
- Re: [whatwg] Comparison of XForms-... Anne van Kesteren
- Re: [whatwg] Comparison of XFo... James Graham
- Re: [whatwg] Comparison of... Michael(tm) Smith
- Re: [whatwg] Comparison of XFo... Klotz, Leigh
- Re: [whatwg] Comparison of... James Graham
- Re: [whatwg] Comparison of... Klotz, Leigh