I would be interested from an advanced level, and I'd have some of my
junior designers look at it too - the ones with some more aggressive
ongoing training. Might be some good feedback on how it reads to them?
Elliotte Harold wrote:
My next book, Refactoring HTML, is gearing up for the review process.
It includes some HTML 5/Web Forms 2.0 content. It also includes some
chapters that are going to drive some people here right up the wall.
(Let's just say, it's very pro-well-formedness, pro-validity, and
pro-XHTML.)
If anyone here would like an early opportunity to review it and
comment on it, please let me know and I'll put you on the list. People
who disagree vehemently with my premises and conclusions are
especially solicited, since in my experience people who don't like
what you're saying are more likely to notice the holes in your
arguments. :-)
It's not necessary to read the entire book to comment on it. Comments
on specific sections are also quite helpful.
