On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:55:50 +0200, Simon Pieters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 06:00:51 +0200, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The spec as it stands now makes a distinction between alt="" and no alt.
How does no alt integrate with the semantics of <figure> in the fallback
case?
Thinking about it, <embed>, <video> and <audio> also don't have fallback
content, but still the <figure> section assumes that there will be
fallback content.
I would suggest that when the embedded content can't be used, and when
there's no fallback content, the figure element still represents embedded
content with a caption, so that e.g. users of HTML5-aware text-only
browsers can read the caption and then download the embedded content to
view in an external app.
--
Simon Pieters
