Again, a false presumption. This was discussed in the context of the
HTML WG at the W3C. Those doors are not closed.
Really? Does that mean I can claim a seat on the board? Where is this discussion about a public standard made public if
not here? Please provide a link to these open discussions and I'll concede your point (and join - it is public, and free
right?)
Ok so I found the other list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Nokia state their
reasons and clearly it was discussed (at Cambridge apparently) but why
two lists for one standard?
Shannon
