Ian Hickson wrote:
...
Note that the Web addresses draft isn't specific to HTML5. It is intended
to apply to any user agent that interacts with Web content, not just Web
browsers and HTML. (That's why we took it out of HTML5.)
...
Be careful; depending on what you call "Web content". For instance, I
would consider the Atom feed content (RFC4287) as "Web content", but
Atom really uses IRIs, and doesn't need workarounds for broken IRIs in
content (as far as I can tell).
Don't leak out workarounds into areas where they aren't needed.
BR, Julian
