On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 10:42:50 +0200, Dr. Markus Walther <walt...@svox.com> wrote:

Silvia,

2009/8/13 Dr. Markus Walther <walt...@svox.com>:
please note that with cue ranges removed, the last HTML 5 method to
perform audio subinterval selection is gone.

Not quite. You can always use the video.currentTime property in a
javascript to directly jump to a time offset in a video. And in your
javascript you can check this property until it arrives at your
determined end time. So, there is a way to do this even now.

How can polling approach that somehow monitors currentTime meet any
halfway-decent accuracy requirements? E.g. to be accurate to 1-3 samples
at 22050 Hz sampling frequency? I doubt your approach could fulfill this.

To my mind, the current turn of events suggests simply to allow
start/end attributes back into the WHATWG spec, eased by the fact that
there were already browser implementations of it.

Highly accurate looping or fragment selection is something that requires a lot of work on the implementation side. I don't have a particular aversion to .start/.end, but think it would be wise to wait for implementor experience before (re)introducing any of start/end, addCueRange/removeCueRanges or a timed text API. Whatever the spec says before that is likely to be wrong.

--
Philip Jägenstedt
Opera Software

Reply via email to