On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Robert O'Callahan <rob...@ocallahan.org> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Jonas Sicking <jo...@sicking.cc> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Rob Ennals <rob.enn...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > In spec language, I think it should be "MAY" release. >> >> It seems to me that the only difference between what we have now (in >> the spec), and your suggestion, would be that implementations could in >> more cases claim to follow the spec. I.e. the only difference seems to >> be one of PR for implementations. Nothing that would actually help web >> authors. > > I think IE and Chrome would have to change their implementations.
Yes. Both under what's in the spec now, and under Robs proposal. What I'm trying to understand is how Robs proposal helps over the current spec. / Jonas
