"Jonas Sicking" <jo...@sicking.cc> wrote: > 2010/3/17 Ian Hickson <i...@hixie.ch>: > > It's not a bad idea... Unfortunately data-* is already being used > quite a > > lot and has been widely advertised, so we have to be careful with > this. > > Anyone else have an opinion on this? > > I don't feel strongly that either name is better. Though I would not > that priv- doesn't make things much clearer since it's totally > undefined who it's private to.
Given that priv-* isn't clearly better, I think it would be better not to annoy early adopters of data-* with a name change. -- Henri Sivonen hsivo...@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/