On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Henri Sivonen <hsivo...@iki.fi> wrote: > "Jonas Sicking" <jo...@sicking.cc> wrote: >> 2010/3/17 Ian Hickson <i...@hixie.ch>: >> > It's not a bad idea... Unfortunately data-* is already being used >> quite a >> > lot and has been widely advertised, so we have to be careful with >> this. >> > Anyone else have an opinion on this? >> >> I don't feel strongly that either name is better. Though I would not >> that priv- doesn't make things much clearer since it's totally >> undefined who it's private to. > > Given that priv-* isn't clearly better, I think it would be better not to > annoy early adopters of data-* with a name change.
Agreed. / Jonas
