On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 1:14 PM, James Hawkins <jhawk...@google.com> wrote: >> Originally we envisioned using a self-closing tag placed in head for >> the intent tag; however, we're now leaning towards not using >> self-closing and having the tag be placed in the body with fallback >> content, e.g., to install an extension to provide similar >> functionality. >> >> <intent action="webintents.org/share"> >> Click here to install our extension that implements sharing! >> </intent> >> >> What are your thoughts on this route? > > So, when the <intent> tag is supported, it's not displayed at all, and > instead solely handled by the browser? This seems okay to me. >
Correct.
