Gryllida <gryll...@gmail.com> schrieb am Fri, 1 Feb 2013 15:41:50 +1030:
> […] > > It is rather common to have a channel for a website, not just one > page. There are some exceptions of sites which have subsites with a > channel for each. A {IRC, XMPP} channel is "an official chat medium > aiming to serve as an official {support, development, contact} > means". For example, https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Themes > irc://irc.mozilla.org/themedev - discussion of theme development for > Mozilla platform http://www.ubuntu.com/* irc://irc.ubuntu.com/ - > official support channel for the distro the w3c network for > individual sections of website - channels for development > collaboration and meetings &c Those relations are not the same. The Mozilla example shows a *discussion about* the collection described by by the referring document, the Ubuntu example shows *support for* the software available at the referring page. The W3C example is probably similar to the Mozilla example, only that it would refer to discussions about documents. > I think a protocol attribute might be redundant as it is a part of > the URL. Indeed. > It may be worth noting that every part of the note I originally sent > is possible to look up and you can try finding proper way to phrase > things (I have no experience in writing documentation of this sort). I do not understand. -- Nils Dagsson Moskopp // erlehmann <http://dieweltistgarnichtso.net>