On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Domenic Denicola
<dome...@domenicdenicola.com> wrote:
> With that taken care of, I still think it would be ideal for the (client)
> RequestBodyStream to be writable, not readable.
See my earlier example for why that would be problematic.
> One thing that might work is for FetchBodyStream to become a pass-through
> stream, i.e. { WritableStream input, ReadableStream output } where the chunks
> are just passed directly through:
So we cannot have a stream type you can both push to and read from?
It's still not really clear to me what steps I need to take based on
this thread.
--
http://annevankesteren.nl/
